
Chapter 5.
Mammograms -Who Needs Them?
Excerpt from Breast Cancer? Breast Health!
By Susun S. Weed
Mammograms distract us from the need for societal commitment to true
prevention
Many of the cancers found by mammographic screening are in situ cancers.
Women with in situ cancers rarely die from them. With or without early
detection and treatment, 93 percent survive more than five years. When
in situ breast cancers are found by mammogram, treated, and added to
the statistical base, breast cancer cure rates and longevity statistics
improve. No wonder mammography is praised. It has done what decades
of research into cures for breast cancer have failed to do: make it
appear that there is some progress in stemming the tide of breast cancer.
But finding and treating an ever-increasing number of breast cancers
isn't real progress; commiting to reducing chemical and radioactive
pollution is.
Read the rest of Chapter 5 (click on any
section below)
Mammograms - Who needs
them?
All mammograms
are x-rays.
Mammograms
are inaccurate.
Mammograms
can't tell if there's cancer.
Mammograms
don't replace breast self-exams.
Mammographic
screening increases risk of breast cancer mortality in premenopausal
women.
Why I haven't
had a baseline mammogram.
Mammograms
aren't safe.
Screening
mammograms lead to overtreatment.
Screening
mammograms don't increase your chances of being cured . . . or of surviving
longer.
Mammograms
don't find cancer before it metastasizes.
Aren't
mammograms life saving for women over 55?
Yearly
screening mammograms aren't cost effective to society nor are they safe
environmentally.
Is there
a less risky way to participate in screening mam-mography?
Mammograms
distract us from the need for societal commitment to true prevention.
Are there
other ways to find early-stage breast cancers?
Mammograms
don't promote breast health.
If You
Decide to Have a Mammogram.
Resources
Read
more Excerpts from Breast Cancer? Breast Health!
NOTE: close this window to simply return to where
you came from